An Independent Scotland

Glasgow at night
Published on Wednesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Written by Rt Hon Alex Salmond MSP

The Edinburgh Agreement last month marked a watershed moment in Scotland's home rule journey

Paving the way for the most important decision our country will make in 300 years, the agreement ensures that we have a referendum designed and delivered by the Scottish Parliament.

The Edinburgh Agreement ensures that, not only is the referendum made in Scotland, but that whatever the decision taken by the people of Scotland, it will be respected by all. That respect for process and outcome is vital as we move forward in forging a new partnership among the people of these islands.

With responsibility for the mechanics of the referendum now resolved, we can finally move to the real and substantive debate about choosing Scotland's future.

My passion has never been to cross some imaginary constitutional finishing line and think the race is won. My aim now, as it always has been, is to deliver a better and fairer society for the people of Scotland. It happens that independence is the way to do this.

The Scottish Government has an ambitious vision for Scotland as a prosperous and successful European country reflecting Scottish values of fairness and opportunity, promoting equality and social cohesion.

Independence will allow us to create an exciting new Scotland – a Scotland fit for the 21st century. We will have the power and the responsibility to find our own solutions to the challenges we face, and to engineer fairness, confidence, innovation and prosperity.

At the same time, it will mean a partnership of equals with other nations, protecting vital Scottish interests like our fishing industry by having a seat at the top table while playing our part in the global community through organisations such as the European Union and United Nations.

I have always believed that civic nationalism should go together with internationalism. An independent Scotland will embrace the interdependence of the modern world, but we would do so on our own terms. For example, a written constitution for an independent Scotland should explicitly ban nuclear weapons from our country.

Over the next two years, Scotland will be involved in its most important debate of the last 300 years – whether to become an independent nation. Donald Dewar once said, when the Scottish Parliament reconvened in 1999, that devolution was about more than our politics and our laws. It was in part about "who we are, how we carry ourselves."

His words were true of devolution, and will be true of independence. And I think that they will in particular be true of the debate over the next two years which will determine our future.

It is absolutely right that people should feel passionately about the question of independence. But that passion must extend to a recognition that Scotland's future will best be served by a debate which is thorough, thoughtful and constructive.

Above all, the campaign for a Yes vote will stress the need to protect the advances Scotland has made with the limited home rule devolution has brought. The social contract which has delivered universal benefits such as free university education and personal care for our elderly is now threatened by both Labour and the Tories, and only a Yes vote to an independent Scotland can properly protect these gains.

Scotland in autumn 2014 must emerge as a united nation – united in recognition of the referendum result; in a shared belief in our potential; and in a hopeful and optimistic view of our shared future.

Politicians, and media commentators, therefore bear a great responsibility in how we conduct ourselves during this debate. As First Minister, I will fulfil mine. In doing so, I will continually set out a positive case for an independent Scotland.

That case is based on a simple, but fundamental, premise. The people best placed to take decisions about Scotland's future are the people who choose to live and work in Scotland.

I believe that the people of Scotland will be persuaded of that case.

The views expressed in the contents below are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of GovToday.

Add comment