More savings possible through better collaborative procurement
The National Audit Office and the Audit Commission have  called for public bodies to work together much more effectively than they currently do to maximise savings from procurement activities.

The public sector procurement landscape is fragmented, with no overall governance. There are nearly 50 professional buying organisations, as well as individual public bodies running commercial and procurement functions. Many of these organisations operate framework agreements for similar goods and services.

The implications for value for money are clear. Public bodies are incurring unnecessary administration costs by duplicating procurement activity. In addition, the public sector is paying a wide range of prices for the same commodities, even within the existing collaborative arrangements. For example, there was a 116 per cent (£6.84 to £14.79) variation between the lowest and highest prices paid for the same broad specification of paper. The difference was 169 per cent (£65 to £175) for LCD computer monitors.

The public sector is not maximising its significant purchasing power. There are a large number of framework agreements and organisations are not exploiting the potential benefits of volume when using these agreements. There are also few constraints on brand or specification choice.

In 2007, the Office of Government Commerce established a Collaborative Procurement Programme which has led to some real improvements to the way public bodies buy goods and services and is managing over £18 billion of spend under nine categories of goods and services. However, a step change in public sector procurement is now required, which builds on the Office of Government Commerce’s existing work.

Mr Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office, said today:

“The public sector spends £220 billion a year on goods and services. Given the potential to make significant savings, it is vital that there is much better coordination of procurement activities to ensure value for money is secured across the public sector.”

Mr Eugene Sullivan, Chief Executive of the Audit Commission, said :

“With all public service costs under pressure, better procurement provides an opportunity to make significant savings that don’t cut into front line services. Most councils already collaborate but, even where there is collaboration, it is not delivering all the possible benefits”
Source: ©NAO 
Comments (0)
Write comment
  smaller | bigger

Write the displayed characters


Editor's Feature
Cllr Steve Reed
Lambeth Council
Lambeth's plans to become Britain's first ever ‘cooperative council' made national headlines when they were anno...

Safer Care: Can you afford it?
Where new build and refurbs are concerned, we believe that the health service may be unaware of the ...
Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Sche...
Many UK businesses are still confused about what the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme will mean for them...
Are Government penalties for hospitals hindering, ...
Speaking as a Director of Nursing from a small DGH, our C difficile figures are very low, we are rep...
The Coalition: Social Care and Disability
I fully support the need to reform our system of social care but I am concerned that any consultatio...
The time is right for heat pumps
Working for an ALMO in Essex, we are currently looking into several schemes where a centralised heat...