Bureaucracy axed to put vulnerable children first

Published on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 09:22
Posted by Scott Buckler

Frontline professionals working to keep children safe from harm will be freed from pointless bureaucracy that has stifled their judgment for too long, under radical plans announced by the Government

The Government published its plans to overhaul the child protection system axing hundreds of pages of instruction manuals and replacing it with short, precise guidance and checklists clearly listing roles and responsibilities.

Ministers want to create a culture that places trust in health professionals, teachers, early years professionals, youth workers, police and social workers, so they can get on with their vital work, without being hampered by unnecessary rules and targets.

Today the Children’s Minister Tim Loughton said professionals must now step-up to the challenge and lead the reforms.  He published a consultation calling for views on the following:

  •     Radically reduced guidance that clearly states the law so all organisations know what they and others must do to protect children.  It does not tell professionals how to do their job, but provides a checklist setting out their duties.

  •     New guidance on undertaking assessments of children in need. The guidance proposes to replace nationally prescribed timescales for assessments with a more flexible approach focused on the needs of each child.

  •     New guidance on Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) to help all services properly learn the lessons from them. The guidance proposes changes so SCRs get to the heart of what happened in a particular case and why, and set out what improvements need to be made to help prevent recurrence.


Today’s consultation follows Professor Eileen Munro’s review, which said the child protection system was overly focused on compliance and too dependent on central prescription and rigid procedures.

Children’s Minister Tim Loughton said:

    We want to change the child protection system fundamentally – I believe the changes proposed today will free hardworking social workers and other professionals from structures, procedures and rulebooks so they can do their best for vulnerable children and their families.

    This is a new mindset and a new relationship between central Government and local services. I am determined that we build on the excellent work of Professor Munro and I trust the workforce to deliver the reforms without the need for excessive central prescription.

    We have worked openly and collaboratively with professionals and children’s leaders to create reforms that are sustainable in the long term. The Government is not in the business of telling local services how to implement the reforms - as has happened in the past - because this has been shown by Professor Munro to result in unintended consequences.

The Government confirmed that SCRs should be published in full to ensure that lessons are learned locally and nationally and also to give the public greater confidence in the child protection system.
 
Tim Loughton:

    The Government is determined to improve the quality and impact of Serious Case Reviews and we need to ensure that we have a robust system to protect children. Unfortunately we can never eliminate all risk, but when tragedies do happen we need everyone to be clear about what went wrong and why. This new guidance is clear that reviews should be thorough and lead to sustainable improvements in services to prevent future harm.
    
    It is essential that as much information as possible is made public so the public can have confidence in the system that protects our most vulnerable children.

The Government’s proposal to remove nationally prescribed timescales for assessments for children in need aims to allow a more flexible process of assessment focused on the individual child’s needs.
 
Tim Loughton:

    These proposed changes build on the encouraging findings from eight trial authorities, which are testing more flexible approaches to assessment.
    
    Replacing rigid timescales gives space for social workers to exercise their professional judgment based on the needs of each child.  Social workers believe the flexibilities allow them to work more efficiently than before. They are able to use their judgment and experience, rather than work to nationwide dictats.

The views expressed in the contents below are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of GovToday.

Add comment



Refresh