Energy Bill measure will not reduce carbon

Published on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 15:44
Posted by Scott Buckler

A tax on the emissions of power companies contained in today’s Energy Bill will do nothing to reduce carbon and threatens to damage the reputation of policies aimed at tackling climate change, according to IPPR

IPPR argues for a different approach to raising the carbon price and raising certainty for investors that would see the creation of a European Carbon Bank to manage the price at an EU-level.

Will Straw, IPPR Associate Director, said:

 “While the ambition to meet CO2 targets and ensure security of supply is correct, the Energy Bill has been beset by delays while specific measures within the package could raise voters’ concerns about their number one issue, rising energy costs.

“The Carbon Price Floor risks giving energy and climate change policy a bad name because it will do nothing to reduce carbon emissions while piling more cost on to the shoulders of already hard-pressed consumers in the UK.

“Because a floor price for carbon in the UK will depress the carbon price elsewhere in Europe, the UK will effectively hand over billions to European polluters. At a time of austerity and efficiency, wasting £1 billion is inexcusable. Instead, we should be pushing for an EU-wide carbon price floor.”

Modelling, published by IPPR last year, suggested that unilaterally introducing a floor price for carbon in Britain will undermine the economic efficiency of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and could waste up to £1 billion. Because the market is Europe-wide, a higher price in the UK due to the carbon price floor will lead to a lower price elsewhere and to the same amount of carbon being emitted.

The scheme will be open to annual scrutiny and potential change through the annual Budget, in the same way as fuel duty. This means the Government’s claim that the scheme will help provide certainty for investors who want to build nuclear power stations or install renewable energy technology is undermined.


The views expressed in the contents below are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of GovToday.

Add comment